The presidential election debate is nearing epic proportions – not the
debate between candidates, but the debate about which candidate is most (or in
this year’s case) least worthy to receive our vote.
Among Christians, this is especially vexing.
There does not appear to be a competent candidate among the
possibilities of either party. If things go as most people expect, the two
candidates who are most likely to survive the nomination process are Donald Trump
and Hillary Clinton.
In my opinion, neither of these candidates are morally fit to be
president of the United States, even if they were politically qualified, which
I do not believe they are. (Not preaching or politicking – just stating my
opinion.)
Therefore, if I vote, it seems I must vote for the lesser of two evils,
cast a write-in vote, or abstain from voting altogether.
The latter course would be, in my opinion, a desertion of my
responsibility as a citizen of the country where God caused me to be born. The
point is arguable, but I believe that “render unto Caesar” at least implies a
responsibility to be an active part of the process of government.
Furthermore, refusing to vote would, in fact, be a vote, because my
missing vote could cause the lesser qualified person to be elected. But at least
I could pat myself on the back for taking the moral high ground.
I could cast a write-in vote, but in light of U.S. history, such an
action would almost assuredly put into office the very person that I dislike
most. Again, I could celebrate a personal moral victory, but it would be a Pyrrhic
victory.
The only thing left is to choose between the lesser of two evils, an
idea which is equally as abhorrent to me as the previous options. So what is a
Christian to do? How do you participate in an election of immoral leaders and
continue to promote the righteousness of Christ? There seems to be a general
disconnect here.
I know that the word of God can answer every question of life if we
allow God to speak to us through it. So I prayed for God to reveal a biblical solution
to the dilemma we find ourselves in, and I would like to offer the following as
a possible answer to that prayer.
First of all, God revealed to Habakkuk that He (God) was going to judge
Israel’s wickedness by calling upon the Babylonians as his tool of discipline.
Habakkuk was intensely angered by such a suggestion and argued vehemently
against such an idea. How could God use a wicked ruler to carry out His
righteous will?
Yet we know that this is exactly what God did.
When Nebuchadnezzar began the conquest of Judah, there was some
resistance, but in general, the resistance was futile against such an awesome
army as that of the Chaldeans, especially since they were instruments in the
hand of God.
In fact, God instructed the prophet Jeremiah to tell the people to
simply lay down their arms and surrender to Nebuchadnezzar and to willingly go into
captivity.
He did what?!
He did what?!
You can read the entire prophecy in Jeremiah 27, but here are some
excerpts (God is speaking):
Jer. 27:5 “It is I
who by my great power and my outstretched arm have made the earth, with the men
and animals that are on the earth, and I give it to whomever it seems right to
me.
8 But if any nation
or kingdom will not serve this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and put its neck
under the yoke of the king of Babylon, I will punish that nation with the
sword, with famine, and with pestilence, declares the LORD, until I have
consumed it by his hand.
11 But any nation
that will bring its neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon and serve him, I
will leave on its own land, to work it and dwell there, declares the LORD.”
On the face of it, this seems so incongruous.
Why would God not defend Israel from such a wicked people? Why would
God allow – or even better, why would God choose a wicked ruler to hold such
dominion over His own chosen people?
In a word, the answer is “The Sovereignty of God,” or, in the case of
Nebuchadnezzar, “Judgment.”
This is God at work in the world, carrying out His perfect will through
the free will decisions of men.
Concerning the rulers of nations, Daniel wrote, “…the Most High rules
the kingdom of men and gives it to whom he will and sets over it the lowliest
of men.” (Dan. 4:17, 25, 32; Dan. 5:21; See also Dan. 2:21 and Dan. 4:35)
Since He is omniscient, God already knows who will win the election in
November. In fact, He not only knows who will win, but He determined the winner
before there were even any candidates from which to choose.
In that case, we might argue that we are justified in abstaining from
voting since the outcome is a given, but such a thought reveals our ignorance
of how God accomplishes His purpose.
Although He does not need us, God has chosen to use man for the
accomplishment of His eternal purpose.
God created the beautiful Garden of Eden, then placed Adam there with a
command to make the rest of the world look like Eden. Why didn’t God just make
the whole world look like Eden? Why command Adam to do it?
God chose the nation of Israel to be His chosen people before they ever
were a people. And He chose to create the nation by the slow process of
procreation beginning with Abraham. Why didn’t God just create a million people
and call them His?
God chose Cyrus, the king of Persia, by name 300 years before he was
ever born to be the instrument by which the Babylonians were judged and the people
of Israel were freed to return to the Promised Land. Why did God wait on Cyrus?
Why didn’t He just say the word and release the people instantly?
Why did Jesus have to die on a cross? It seems a cruel way to
consummate the plan of redemption. It would seem to us that there must have
been a better way.
But we would be wrong.
Except for a few occasions like creation, God always accomplishes His
perfect will through the free will decisions of men.
Thus there is no conflict between sovereignty and free will.
This is just how God gets things done.
Thus choosing the lesser of two evils in the upcoming election is not a
moral failure on my part, but a fulfillment of God’s plan.
Whoever the choices for POTUS are on the ballot in November will only
be the choices because God chose them to be the candidates.
And since everything that God does is righteous, for me to choose the
lesser of two evils that God put before me as choices would not be an act of
immorality, but an act of righteous obedience.
Well, I could never have said it so eloquently (I have never had your gifts for words!) but I came to this same conclusion several weeks ago. And since Proverbs 16:33 is still in the Bible, I guess I can follow God's leadership and choice in this situation and every other one. He has never made a mistake yet; never will. God placed judgment on His people through corrupt governments and rulers. I'm satisfied He may still use such methods today. I may not like that, but I haven't quite gotten as big as God yet. And, since I never will get there, I'll keep loving Him and following Him!
ReplyDelete