Thursday, November 29, 2012

Forgiveness


Recently, we learned that a couple who are friends of ours are separated and contemplating ending their marriage. It seems the husband committed an indiscretion that the wife cannot bring herself to forgive. In fact, she is repulsed by his actions to such a degree that she can barely stand to be in his presence for very long, so they are permanently temporarily separated. Forgiveness is not even on her list of response options. Murder, maybe, but not forgiveness.
Please understand that I am not writing this to judge either of these great people. I love them and pray that God will perform a miracle of reconciliation in their lives and restore them to effective service in the ministry of the church. Nevertheless, real-life events like this often bring the things of God into sharp focus. This event turns my mind toward the meaning of forgiveness.
First of all, consider the reaction of this wife to her husband’s breach of trust and then put the entire event in the context of eternity. In other words, multiply the wife’s feelings of revulsion by infinity. Then consider the sin of Adam against an infinite, eternal, holy and righteous God. Now you can begin to get a feel for the separation that existed between holy God and fallen man. Yet God forgives! In fact, He had the plan of redemption – which includes the response of forgiveness of sin – in place before He ever created Adam. (2 Tim. 1.9-10)
God is omnipotent – He knows all things – past, present, and future. This means that He planned to forgive Adam even before Adam sinned. Forgiveness was built into the relationship package. Adam was God’s creation “for better or for worse.” One might argue about when God knew what and how much control He had over Adam's actions, but the fact is that He planned to forgive even before Adam sinned.
If marriages were built on the same premise, then spouses would respond to indiscretions of their mates in a very different manner. Even if we were repulsed by the others actions, we would be drawn toward them,willing to make a sacrificial effort toward reconciliation. The problem is that we are flesh and blood. We are not God.
I am convinced that forgiveness is an attribute that is uniquely God's. Only God can do it. There is no other power in the Universe that can forgive. It is that hard. For this wife to forgive her husband will require the intervention of the omnipotent Holy Spirit empowering her to do what she could never do on her own. Only He can heal such glaring wounds. We are powerless against them. All of our efforts will never mend a broken heart or restore a violated trust. Such mending requires the touch of the miraculous – something which is no challenge for God.
Here is another point: To forgive requires our complete surrender of self to God. This is not a call to fatalism, but to surrender. Forgiveness is extremely hard – virtually impossible – but forgiveness must begin with the offended: God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us (Rom. 5.8).
I am sure in her anger this wife probably would like to kill her unfaithful husband, but God even thought of that and did it for us in substitution: In Christ we have redemption through his blood (that means someone killed Him on our behalf), the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace (Eph. 1.7).
Now for a moment consider the husband. If he could take it back, I am certain he would. But that, too, is impossible. He can never undo the wrong. I am sure he is making every effort at retribution, but there is nothing that a person can do to restore trust back to its original condition, no matter how hard we might try or how good we are in the future.
Again, put that in terms of eternity. How could a finite man think that he could ever be good enough for God to accept his works as retribution or as payment enough to restore the broken fellowship that existed before sin? The sin of man was of infinite proportion and thus it cannot be atoned for apart from an act of infinite love – better known as grace. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God (Eph. 2.8).
When it comes to love between a husband and wife, we tend to want to lean away from the sacred and holy for various reasons – especially when the subject concerns intimacy. Yet in light of all that I said above, we should think about this: When we say to each other, "I love you," it must include such an idea as God taught us by His actions:
In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins (1 John 4.10).
With this kind of love, when we say to each other "I love you," we are confessing that, no matter what happens – even when I am offended and repulsed by your behavior – I will pay the price for reconciliation. "I love you" means that my desire for you will always outweigh your transgressions – that even when you step back or even if you step away, I will not move except in our direction. I love you so, that I give to you that which means more to me than anything else in all the world – myself (John 3.16).
As with most marriages, I fear, this couple did not make this kind of covenant. After the trust is broken, the covenant cannot easily be restored short of the supernatural. Of course, the best thing would be never to violate the others trust, but such things are common among humans. So the next best thing is to make the commitment before the flesh has an opportunity to fatally wound our spirit and our relationships.


Friday, November 23, 2012

A Great Historical Principle



It's been almost three weeks since the presidential election, but here is a reminder for all those who are still struggling with the outcome.

"...all representative characters act, consciously or unconsciously, as the free and responsible organs of the spirit of their age, which moulds them first before they can mould it in turn, and that the spirit of the age itself, whether good or bad or mixed, is but an instrument in the hands of divine Providence, which rules and overrules all the actions and motives of men." (Phillip Schaff, History of the Christian Church Vol. III, 1882)

Thus President Obama is simply a product of our culture and an icon for the moral, ethical, spiritual, and political principles which have come to define this age of history. Even so, he and the world in which he governs serve as instruments in the hand of God. Whatever President Obama's legacy, whether for good or for evil, he will have served the purposes of God in the fulfillment of His plan for the creation. By the willful decisions of men God's will is fulfilled.

I had a conversation with a lady in our town just before the election. She was extolling the greatness of God and how times like we are in now require us to put all our faith in Him. I replied that Christians should be setting the example for the world of what it means to have peace because God is in control of all things. At this point in the conversation, she was in agreement with me.

Then I said, “Daniel 4.17 says, ‘God chooses the rulers of nations and he always chooses the basest of men.’”

She immediately responded with “Oh, I don’t believe that. God is never going to override our free will. He allows us to choose our rulers then He works with whomever we choose.” She went on to add that God did not put Hitler or Stalin in place.

I tried to point out the examples of Pharaoh and of Nebuchadnezzar, but she was not prepared to hear my explanation, so I tactfully let the subject drop.

Free will. Men will not let it go. Man will not willingly surrender to God that which he seized from Him in the Garden.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

A New Revival


Yes, I know. I have started and stopped posting to this blog on several occasions. So this should not be a surprise. I will give this another effort. Maybe this time, maybe the revival will stick. If you would like to comment, click on the title of this article. Comments will be at the bottom. Thanks for visiting!

I am subscribed to several sites that send daily emails. This morning one of them posted an article that I really liked entitled "Why You Cannot 'Do All Things' Through Christ." If you are like me, you probably had a knee-jerk reaction that said something like, "What!" You should read the article to get the whole gist of what the author was saying, but in summary, he pointed out that Paul wrote this verse (Phil 4.13) from prison - a place he could not get out of, even though his faith in Christ was so very strong. The verse does not give us permission to claim that we can accomplish any goal we set our hearts simply because we depend on Christ to accomplish that goal through us. Sometimes, we fail. How would we explain that?

What the verse means is that, even in the midst of prison or any other adversity or time of blessing, we can still praise the Lord of Heaven because of Christ. It means that we can be content with having much or having little, in good times as well as in bad, when the news is uplifting or crushing. Christ does not change and has promised to never leave us. Therefore, we can face anything that comes our way through faith in Him.

Oftentimes, we must re-evaluate our traditional interpretation of what "thus saith the Lord."

I pray you have a great day.